Monday 4 April 2011

Comic 881: To hate or not to hate

Alt-text: My normal approach is useless here, too.
So we arrive at this comic straight after April Fools. This has to be the most personal strip Randall has put out, assuming it's related to previous comics. It's also a pretty good effort at 'show, don't tell', despite the terrible-as-usual artwork (the freaky hand around his stick-waist is a little disturbing, and they appear to be sitting on a desk). But we are used to such things now.

I can't bring myself to hate this one, so I guess I haven't spent enough time on the 'net. Sure, there is a hint of playing for sympathy from someone else's illness, but if this whole deal is happening to a close friend relative, then fair enough, he's allowed sympathy. True, he doesn't have the grit, heart or eloquence of Terry Pratchett or Christopher Hitchens, but then again they are dealing with their own illnesses, not someone else's.

I don't like this comic. I wouldn't share it with people who have or have had cancer. I don't relate to it as someone who has had friends and family diagnosed with cancer. But if a carer drew this and showed it to me, I wouldn't hate it. I would just see it as a little bit of self-expression. I just wish he hadn't made it public, is all.

Anyway, if you want hate you'll probably have to wait and see what Rob pulls together. I doubt he'll pass up such a glorious opportunity to troll.

BINGO TIME!

Not as good a showing, despite two threads and over two hundred comments.


I'm surprised there was no 'Why do you read xkcd?' or 'I am leaving FOREVER'. Oh well.

30 comments:

  1. This comic made me laugh. Out loud, no less. This was my favourite XKCD this year. I mean, that was a quality delivery, and NOT what I expected at all. Does that make me a terrible person?

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comic would have been a lot better without the final panel. The art in the last panel's pretty bad and it goes from having a kind of dark, though still sincere, sense of humor to being really saccharine through stick figure hugs.

    Last panel doesn't add anything to the joke, and since we don't care about the characters seeing their emotional reaction doesn't do anything.

    Also the alt-text is a reference to one of my absolute least favorite xkcd's-- the "my normal approach is useless here" comic was when I made the realization that xkcd wasn't just a comic I didn't get, but something flat-out bad.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The man-child is facing mortality. How quaint. You get old and you die. Can't play in your ball pit forever you know.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yes Rinnon, that does make you a terrible person. Capn is also a terrible person, but for a large list of other reasons.

    Jasper - I don't think there is a joke in this comic...

    ReplyDelete
  5. There's a joke, it's just pretty black humor. The line "because of the real-life applications" is the "punchline" of the comic-- the same thing that made statistics reassuring is now making it scary.

    It's not laugh-out-loud funny, but it's still what the comic was building to. Continuing after that point goes from "dark, slightly comic point" to "I AM BEING SERIOUS NOW CRY AT THESE STICK FIGURES HUGGING." If it weren't for that panel the comic would just be really, really dark and one of Randy's cleverest pieces, instead of being awkward, sentimental glurge.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Really? That last panel is what made me laugh. The slightest thought, that he was being serious, hadn't even begun to speculate about the merest possibility of crossing my mind.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Oh god, I can't wait for Rob's post on this one tbh.

    This is the XKCD version of CAD's "Loss"

    ReplyDelete
  8. NO!

    You just stop right fucking there with that shit, you uneducated cuddlefuck.

    Nothing will ever be shittier than that. I had already stopped reading CAD for a long while when that hit, and even then, with my supposed apathy, it elicited my biggest what the fuck moment in my webcomic readerdom.

    Nothing will ever come close to topping what was quite literally an abortion of a webcomic.

    CADbortion is my 9/11.

    ReplyDelete
  9. "Loss" was pretty good, I thought.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Funny you should mention "Loss." I refer to it in the review I sent Rob this morning.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Dilemma! What's Rob going to do?

    1) Post Gamer's review, which is presumably an actual critique?

    2) Post his own rant designed to troll the xkcd-loving cuddlefish, who are becoming increasingly absent?

    3) Post some Megdall fanfic, completely ignore the salient points and troll the xkcdsuckers?

    ReplyDelete
  12. @Jasper - okay, I sort of see the joke, but I really don't think that's what he was going for. I think the irony is meant to be tragic, not comic.

    Also, it appears Rinnon has been narmed.

    ReplyDelete
  13. @Kitten

    I would expect Rob to choose #1, simply because it's less work for him. And, as with my last review, my guest post is less raging and more mourning for what xkcd has become. I think you'll all be surprised.

    ReplyDelete
  14. ...And I was wrong. Oh well.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Rob wrote something resembling a real review. I was wrong too. Guess he felt he had something to say.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Rob posted an actual critique filled with pointed hate. He was just 3 days off schedule AMIRITE??!

    ReplyDelete
  17. i just want to note that this is basically the first time i've ever not posted a guest review (actually I think it's the second or third), and the people were clamoring for proper hate.

    clamoring!

    maybe i'll post gamer's review tomorrow

    ReplyDelete
  18. "maybe i'll post gamer's review tomorrow"

    Good deal. We're nothing if not "fair and balanced," right?

    ReplyDelete
  19. I'm pretty sure Christopher Hitchens is just an asshole who gets away with half the shit he says because he has a British Accent

    ReplyDelete
  20. Are you saying Americans let you get away with things if you have a British accent?

    Hmmm, good to know...

    ReplyDelete
  21. British accent?

    What the fuck is a British accent?
    Geordie?
    Scouser?
    Oxbridge?
    Cockney?
    Various Northern dialects?
    Various Scottish dialects?

    I did not mention Welsh as we both know they're not real.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Americans are quite magnanimous and accepting of differences my Externally Surmised Kitten - doncha know?
    For instance when I walk down a street in England I often hear: "Hey nine-iron zipper-head come over here and suck my dick". In America I hear instead: "Hey sexy girl come over here and suck my dick".
    Makes for a world of difference.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Don't be ridiculous, ALT-F. All British people sound like Peter Cushing.

    ReplyDelete
  24. And look like him too!

    ReplyDelete
  25. Except Keith Richards and Amy Winehouse. But then again, they are one and the same person.
    Think about it. When one is off doing Pirates the other is in Rehab - or so they would have us believe - so we never see them at the same time.

    ReplyDelete
  26. They both look like Peter Cushing too.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Internally Irrigated Kitten?
    Why does the London 2012 Olympic Logo look like a drawing of Lisa Simpsom giving a robot a blowjob?

    Citius, Altius, Fortius indeed!

    ReplyDelete
  28. It's a secret message readable only by Londoners.

    It is about blowjobs though.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Perhaps it is a visual representation of Cockney Rhyming Slang?

    Dick-licks = Olympics?

    ReplyDelete

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.