Tuesday, 8 March 2011

Introducing... xkcd sucks comment thread bingo!

Ever had a feeling of deja vu when you venture into the xkcd sucks comment thread? Tired of seeing the same old shit over and over? Play XKCD Sucks Comment Thread Bingo! Cross off a square when a comment matches it! Notice that you will never get that middle square! Get five squares in a row and you win the knowledge that the empty drudgery of your existence is destined to end in futile, pointless horror!

Hurrah!

Artist's Corner:

A wonderful parody of the Nolan diagram, as made by Jon Levi:


And of course by 'wonderful', I mean putrid and contemptible in a way I never thought possible.
Posted by Lord Kitten at 10:39

9 comments:

  1. Capn8 March 2011 at 17:54

    xkcdsucks: where trolls turn into valuable community members and vice versa.

    But in the end we all turn into great soft jelly things. Like Rob. He might have a mouth, but the screaming is muffled by food and subtlety.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous8 March 2011 at 19:00

    The Softness awaits us all.

    Also, BINGO!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Lord Kitten8 March 2011 at 19:01

    I am officially renaming Rob 'Buttockmaggot Vomitfat'.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Lord Kitten8 March 2011 at 19:04

    And there is no bingo yet. I'm watching you filthy cheats carefully...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous8 March 2011 at 20:04

    More Megan for the Megan God [[Robdall]]!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Capn8 March 2011 at 22:43

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Capn8 March 2011 at 22:45

    This needs to be in more places

    Ugh. I wish I could just fucking edit comments when I'm took quick on the submit button.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Lord Kitten9 March 2011 at 06:35

    Breast milk for the Throne of Robdall!

    And look, I actually listened to you, Capn. Even if you are a big ol' Nazi.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Capn9 March 2011 at 20:50

    I'm like half of your comments you insolent child. Of course you listened to me.

    Captcha mantrapy: I don't know, but I'm sure it involves transsexuals.

    ReplyDelete

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)